Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.4. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.082. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is faster at 9.85s vs 103.83s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Its score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.6), while responding about 10.5x faster than Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.6 6.4
Rank #91 #102
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 48.5%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.643 0.751
Total Cost $0.082 $0.073
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.300 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 77,550 102,646
Output Tokens 28,036 29,370
Reasoning Tokens 219,491 0
Response Time (avg) 103.83s 9.85s
Response Time (max) 912.19s 123.00s
Response Time (total) 2180.47s 157.63s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#91 Gemma 4 26B A4B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#102 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 272.54s 5,062 14,838 44,567
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair