Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Summary

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.3. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.103. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is faster at 9.85s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15It has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 7.0x faster than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.3 6.4
Rank #103 #102
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 48.5%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.629 0.751
Total Cost $0.103 $0.073
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,604 102,646
Output Tokens 123,079 29,370
Reasoning Tokens 42,754 0
Response Time (avg) 68.74s 9.85s
Response Time (max) 304.19s 123.00s
Response Time (total) 1374.86s 157.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#103 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#102 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair