Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.3. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.103. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 1.8x less than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.5
Rank #103 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 40.9%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.629 0.763
Total Cost $0.103 $0.058
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,604 102,316
Output Tokens 123,079 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 42,754 0
Response Time (avg) 68.74s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 304.19s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 1374.86s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#103 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair