Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.068. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 47.93s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while responding about 10.1x faster than Laguna XS 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #97 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 40.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.746 0.763
Total Cost $0.068 $0.058
Input Price $0.060 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $0.120 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,989 102,316
Output Tokens 30,750 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 491,833 0
Response Time (avg) 47.93s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 422.72s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 1054.49s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
30.6s
Tokens
4,678 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair