Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

Ring-2.6-1T (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.3. Ring-2.6-1T (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.103 vs $0.548. Claude Sonnet 5 is faster at 6.04s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelRing-2.6-1T (medium)It has the best score here (6.3), while costing about 5.4x less than Claude Sonnet 5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 none Release: 2026-06-30 Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #106 #103
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 60.6%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.840 0.629
Total Cost $0.548 $0.103
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 161,035 113,604
Output Tokens 22,511 123,079
Reasoning Tokens 0 42,754
Response Time (avg) 6.04s 68.74s
Response Time (max) 33.39s 304.19s
Response Time (total) 132.85s 1374.86s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Claude Sonnet 5

none
Cost
$0.061
Time
53.7s
Tokens
6,172 tok

#103 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 3.67s 10,590 1,864 0
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair