Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

Ring-2.6-1T (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.103. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-LiteIts score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 1.6x less than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #110 #103
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 60.6%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 0.629
Total Cost $0.066 $0.103
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 113,604
Output Tokens 14,746 123,079
Reasoning Tokens 0 42,754
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 68.74s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 304.19s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 1374.86s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#103 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair