Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.231. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 7.82s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #95 #103
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 60.6%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 2.061
Total Cost $0.145 $0.231
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 106,339
Output Tokens 15,302 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 0
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#103 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair