Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

LongCat 2.0 (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.391. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 1.7x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.6
Rank #96 #103
Reliability 9.6 9.9
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 60.6%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 2.061
Total Cost $0.391 $0.231
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 106,339
Output Tokens 5,679 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 0
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#103 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair