Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.231 vs $0.469. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max PreviewIt has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.0x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #102 #103
Reliability 9.4 9.9
Consistency 8.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 60.6%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.202 2.061
Total Cost $0.469 $0.231
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 106,339
Output Tokens 30,466 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 0
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 172.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#103 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair