Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.128 vs $0.369. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 9.34s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 2.9x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #104 #101
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 59.1%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 3.074 1.421
Total Cost $0.369 $0.128
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.808 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.539 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 112,359
Output Tokens 11,677 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 0
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#101 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair