Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.779. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.34s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 5.4x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #94 #92
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 59.1%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 7.319 1.421
Total Cost $0.779 $0.145
Input Price $0.450 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $2.700 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,167 112,359
Output Tokens 32,889 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 241,303 0
Response Time (avg) 106.32s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 1085.11s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 2339.12s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

#92 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair