Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.646. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.34s vs 16.70s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 4.5x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Release: 2026-03-03 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.5 6.6
Rank #99 #92
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 59.1%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 4.969 1.421
Total Cost $0.646 $0.145
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,185 112,359
Output Tokens 14,717 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 397,483 0
Response Time (avg) 16.70s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 309.35s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 367.47s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#99 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
3.7s
Tokens
1,203 tok

#92 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 8,138 660 1,060
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair