Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.646. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) is faster at 16.70s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 7.9x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Release: 2026-03-03 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #110 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 69.7%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.969 3.124
Total Cost $0.646 $0.082
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,185 105,447
Output Tokens 14,717 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 397,483 230,682
Response Time (avg) 16.70s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 309.35s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 367.47s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
3.7s
Tokens
1,203 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 8,138 660 1,060
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair