Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.082. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.58s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.5), while costing about 1.6x less than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.4 6.5
Rank #112 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.431 3.124
Total Cost $0.052 $0.082
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,942 105,447
Output Tokens 14,292 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 0 230,682
Response Time (avg) 1.58s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 34.72s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#112 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair