Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.4. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.052. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.58s vs 13.32s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewIt has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 8.4x faster than Ling 3.0 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available
Score 6.4 6.4
Rank #112 #114
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.7 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.431 0.000
Total Cost $0.052 $0.000
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,942 132,224
Output Tokens 14,292 92,393
Reasoning Tokens 0 211,994
Response Time (avg) 1.58s 13.32s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 75.27s
Response Time (total) 34.72s 292.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#112 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair