Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.068. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) is faster at 13.32s vs 47.93s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 42.4%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 Flash (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.5), while responding about 3.6x faster than Laguna XS 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available
Score 6.4 6.5
Rank #114 #108
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 42.4%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.746
Total Cost $0.000 $0.068
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,224 118,989
Output Tokens 92,393 30,750
Reasoning Tokens 211,994 491,833
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 47.93s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 422.72s
Response Time (total) 292.99s 1054.49s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#108 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
30.6s
Tokens
4,678 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair