Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.082. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) is faster at 13.32s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 Flash (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.5), while responding about 2.4x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.4 6.5
Rank #118 #111
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.6 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 3.124
Total Cost $0.000 $0.082
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,224 105,447
Output Tokens 92,393 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 211,994 230,682
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 292.99s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#118 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#111 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair