Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

LongCat 2.0 vs MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.4. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.104. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.17s vs 46.28s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#177
Total Output Tokens
9,375
Response Time (avg)
5.17s
Total Cost
$0.044
Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
327,048
Response Time (avg)
46.28s
Total Cost
$0.104
Recommended model LongCat 2.0

It has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 2.4x less than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.4 6.4
Rank #177 #178
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.549 3.575
Total Cost $0.044 $0.104
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,752 105,456
Output Tokens 9,375 7,108
Reasoning Tokens 0 319,940
Response Time (avg) 5.17s 46.28s
Response Time (max) 48.38s 316.27s
Response Time (total) 113.83s 1018.12s
Parameters 1.6T total (48B active) 310B total (15B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#177 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

#178 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair