Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Ling 3.0 Flash (high) leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.3. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.044. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 13.32s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.4), while responding about 2.6x faster than Ling 3.0 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.4 6.3
Rank #114 #118
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 36.4%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.627
Total Cost $0.000 $0.044
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,224 108,743
Output Tokens 92,393 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 211,994 0
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 292.99s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#118 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair