Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

LongCat 2.0 (high) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.469. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) is faster at 32.20s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.6), while costing about 5.8x less than LongCat 2.0 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.6 6.5
Rank #102 #107
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.2 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 69.7%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.202 3.124
Total Cost $0.469 $0.082
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 105,447
Output Tokens 30,466 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 230,682
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair