Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.369. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 9.85s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Its score stays close to the best score here (6.4 vs 6.5), while costing about 5.1x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.5 6.4
Rank #104 #113
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 48.5%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 0.751
Total Cost $0.369 $0.073
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 102,646
Output Tokens 11,677 29,370
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 0
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 9.85s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 123.00s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 157.63s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#113 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair