Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.369 vs $0.391. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.7), while responding about 16.7x faster than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.5 6.7
Rank #104 #96
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 7.4 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 53.0%
Flaky tests 7 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 3.910
Total Cost $0.369 $0.391
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 90,909
Output Tokens 11,677 5,679
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 297,369
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 100.31s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 560.39s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 2206.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair