Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.738. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while costing about 5.1x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.7 6.9
Rank #95 #89
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 6.784
Total Cost $0.145 $0.738
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 129,041
Output Tokens 15,302 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 614,312
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#89 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair