Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

Cobuddy vs GLM 5.1 benchmark comparison: GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.6 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.063. GLM 5.1 is faster at 4.10s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 41.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.1 - It has the best score here (5.6), while responding about 9.7x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 4.9 5.6
Rank #145 #120
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 41.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.843
Total Cost $0.000 $0.063
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.975 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $4.301 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 47,133
Output Tokens 1,677 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#120 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
GLM 5.1 4.0 6.3 25.0% 2 2.11s 555 305 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
GLM 5.1 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 32.57s 22,831 2,129 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
GLM 5.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.08s 7,107 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
GLM 5.1 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 1.99s 687 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
GLM 5.1 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 790ms 477 39 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
GLM 5.1 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 1.98s 636 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
GLM 5.1 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.45s 609 151 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
GLM 5.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.68s 6,789 300 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
GLM 5.1 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.34s 186 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair