Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Cobuddy vs Qwen3.6 27B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.9. Cobuddy has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.025. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 3.72s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 47.6%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.6 27B - It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 10.7x faster than Cobuddy.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 4.9 5.5
Rank #145 #124
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 47.6%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.467
Total Cost $0.000 $0.025
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.286 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 52,721
Output Tokens 1,677 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#124 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair