Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Cobuddy (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 3.8. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.036. Cobuddy (medium) is faster at 39.90s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelCobuddy (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while responding about 2.1x faster than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02
Score 4.7 3.8
Rank #203 #220
Reliability 10.0 5.0
Consistency 7.2 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.187
Total Cost $0.000 $0.036
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 17,070
Output Tokens 1,677 29,045
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 209,516
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 82.24s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 226.38s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 1315.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#203 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#220 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair