Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Summary

Cobuddy (medium) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.9. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.020. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is faster at 3.41s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 31.8%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B - It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 11.7x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-10

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 4.9 5.3
Rank #160 #145
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 31.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 0.393
Total Cost $0.000 $0.020
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 47,735
Output Tokens 1,677 3,383
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 3.41s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 46.00s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 71.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#160 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#145 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 10.00s 453 98 4,666
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 4.8 10.0 25.0% 0 1.59s 696 312 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.38s 18,324 465 7,265
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 46.00s 20,175 1,137 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 17.36s 8,181 275 5,591
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.01s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 2.9 4.4 22.2% 2 128.15s 540 10 49,454
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 465ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 4.2 9.9 0.0% 0 23.23s 498 76 3,782
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.12s 522 66 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 11.60s 508 64 2,842
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 513ms 711 69 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 12.83s 561 189 5,808
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 1.00s 714 575 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.19s 3,505 133 294
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.04s 8,211 264 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 36.98s 153 9 6,863
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 295ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair