Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 (high) leads on average score with 5.4 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.127. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.98s vs 111.61s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.4), while costing about 16.3x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.8 5.4
Rank #192 #167
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 3.153
Total Cost $0.008 $0.127
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 208,931
Output Tokens 2,169 175,588
Reasoning Tokens 0 409,276
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 111.61s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 1190.11s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 2455.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#192 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.8s
Tokens
1,389 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair