Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Granite 4.1 8B

Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.0. Granite 4.1 8B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.008. Granite 4.1 8B is faster at 1.45s vs 2.98s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 9.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#205
Total Output Tokens
2,169
Response Time (avg)
2.98s
Total Cost
$0.008
Rank
#224
Total Output Tokens
5,996
Response Time (avg)
1.45s
Total Cost
$0.007
Recommended model Trinity Large Preview

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 Granite 4.1 8B Granite 4.1 8B none Release: 2026-05-01
Score 4.8 4.0
Rank #205 #224
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 9.1%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 0.315
Total Cost $0.008 $0.007
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 113,827
Output Tokens 2,169 5,996
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 1.45s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 16.67s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 31.96s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#224 IBM: Granite 4.1 8B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.2s
Tokens
491 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Granite 4.1 8B 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 775ms 8,344 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair