Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.7. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 10.11s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.8), while responding about 2.1x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.7 8.8
Rank #18 #17
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 73.0%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 3.606
Total Cost $0.679 $0.469
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 59,923
Output Tokens 11,858 3,722
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 88,947
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 10.11s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 54.15s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 212.29s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#18 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair