Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Summary

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.8. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $0.960. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 10.11s vs 59.63s, with pass rates of 73.0% vs 81.0%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.8 vs 8.9), while costing about 2.0x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #17 #14
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.0% 81.0%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.606 7.024
Total Cost $0.469 $0.960
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,923 42,362
Output Tokens 3,722 2,273
Reasoning Tokens 88,947 144,367
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 59.63s
Response Time (max) 54.15s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 212.29s 1252.17s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

#14 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair