Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.8. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $1.107. Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) is faster at 9.72s vs 10.11s, with pass rates of 84.1% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.8 vs 8.8), while costing about 2.4x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 medium Release: 2026-05-28 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.8 8.8
Rank #16 #17
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.1% 73.0%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 6.512 3.606
Total Cost $1.107 $0.469
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 61,007 59,923
Output Tokens 26,495 3,722
Reasoning Tokens 5,901 88,947
Response Time (avg) 9.72s 10.11s
Response Time (max) 38.03s 54.15s
Response Time (total) 204.19s 212.29s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.8

medium
Cost
$0.057
Time
23.1s
Tokens
2,412 tok

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.33s 10,590 9,945 1,381
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair