Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.7. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.213 vs $0.469. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 10.11s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 73.0% vs 84.1%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)It has the best score here (8.8), while responding about 2.3x faster than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.8 8.7
Rank #17 #19
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.5 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.0% 84.1%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.606 2.159
Total Cost $0.469 $0.213
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,923 37,199
Output Tokens 3,722 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 88,947 49,500
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 54.15s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 212.29s 488.94s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

#19 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair