Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (low) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.6. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.372 vs $0.469. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 10.11s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 73.0% vs 82.5%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)It has the best score here (8.8), while responding about 3.3x faster than GLM 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 8.8 8.6
Rank #17 #20
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.0% 82.5%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.606 1.668
Total Cost $0.469 $0.372
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $3.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,923 35,224
Output Tokens 3,722 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 88,947 102,996
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 54.15s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 212.29s 435.99s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

#20 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair