Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Summary

GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.8. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.469 vs $0.740. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) is faster at 10.11s vs 16.22s, with pass rates of 73.0% vs 82.5%.

Recommended modelMuse Spark 1.1 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.8 vs 8.9), while costing about 1.6x less than GPT-5.3-Codex (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Release: 2026-07-16 GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium Release: 2026-02-05
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #17 #13
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 73.0% 82.5%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.606 4.932
Total Cost $0.469 $0.740
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,923 34,299
Output Tokens 3,722 2,357
Reasoning Tokens 88,947 46,189
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 16.22s
Response Time (max) 54.15s 100.93s
Response Time (total) 212.29s 340.67s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
39.2s
Tokens
4,947 tok

#13 GPT-5.3-Codex

medium
Cost
$0.049
Time
54.9s
Tokens
3,580 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503
GPT-5.3-Codex 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.50s 7,302 535 10,890

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair