Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.5. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.393 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 4.73s vs 7.13s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 74.6%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 1.5x faster than GPT-5.2 Chat.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.7 8.5
Rank #16 #22
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 74.6%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 2.803
Total Cost $0.679 $0.393
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 34,212
Output Tokens 11,858 23,744
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 0
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 7.13s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 149.69s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#22 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair