Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.7 Plus (medium)

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.267 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 51.51s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#37
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Rank
#43
Total Output Tokens
179,429
Response Time (avg)
51.51s
Total Cost
$0.267
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

It has the best score here (8.0), while responding about 6.7x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03
Score 8.0 7.9
Rank #37 #43
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 75.8%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.308 2.072
Total Cost $0.604 $0.267
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,248 115,233
Output Tokens 30,424 6,162
Reasoning Tokens 0 173,267
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 51.51s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 315.30s
Response Time (total) 168.39s 1133.15s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#37 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#43 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair