Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 8.5 vs 8.5. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.376 vs $0.393. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.13s vs 20.35s, with pass rates of 74.6% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.2 ChatIt has the best score here (8.5), while responding about 2.9x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 8.5 8.5
Rank #22 #23
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.6% 73.0%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 2.803 2.686
Total Cost $0.393 $0.376
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,212 39,981
Output Tokens 23,744 319,958
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.13s 20.35s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 113.98s
Response Time (total) 149.69s 427.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#23 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair