Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.0. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.604 vs $1.143. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#37
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.4), while costing about 1.9x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.0 8.4
Rank #37 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.308 8.173
Total Cost $0.604 $1.143
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,248 79,240
Output Tokens 30,424 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 0 164,842
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 168.39s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#37 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair