Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Claude Opus 5 (low) leads on average score with 8.6 vs 8.4. Claude Opus 5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.121 vs $1.143. Claude Opus 5 (low) is faster at 6.99s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 5 (low)It has the best score here (8.6), while responding about 9.7x faster than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.6 8.4
Rank #23 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.593 8.173
Total Cost $1.121 $1.143
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,773 79,240
Output Tokens 14,123 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 3,896 164,842
Response Time (avg) 6.99s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 30.67s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 153.73s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#23 Claude Opus 5

low
Cost
$0.062
Time
30.2s
Tokens
2,615 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 6.70s 10,590 2,442 760
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair