Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 (low) vs GLM 5.3 Flash (max)

The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.7. GLM 5.3 Flash (max) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $1.121. Claude Opus 5 (low) is faster at 6.99s vs 52.10s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 81.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-26

Rank
#27
Total Output Tokens
17,992
Response Time (avg)
6.99s
Total Cost
$1.121
Rank
#29
Total Output Tokens
204,340
Response Time (avg)
52.10s
Total Cost
$0.059
Recommended model GLM 5.3 Flash (max)

It has the best score here (8.7), while costing about 19.2x less than Claude Opus 5 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low Release: 2026-07-25 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash max Release: 2026-08-26
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #27 #29
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 81.8%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.223 0.365
Total Cost $1.121 $0.059
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,770 96,873
Output Tokens 13,604 7,637
Reasoning Tokens 4,388 196,703
Response Time (avg) 6.99s 52.10s
Response Time (max) 30.67s 333.47s
Response Time (total) 153.80s 1146.24s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 320B total (18B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 Claude Opus 5

low
Cost
$0.062
Time
30.2s
Tokens
2,615 tok

#29 GLM 5.3 Flash

max
Cost
$0.005
Time
296.5s
Tokens
16,250 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 6.70s 10,590 2,442 760
GLM 5.3 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 43.37s 7,317 381 23,692

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair