- Rank
- #41
- Total Output Tokens
- 17,992
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.99s
- Total Cost
- $1.121
Claude Opus 5 (low) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high)
The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.540 vs $1.121. Claude Opus 5 (low) is faster at 6.99s vs 10.05s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 83.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #39
- Total Output Tokens
- 204,625
- Response Time (avg)
- 10.05s
- Total Cost
- $0.540
Recommended model
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (high)
It has the best score here (8.8), while costing about 2.1x less than Claude Opus 5 (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Rank | #41 | #39 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 83.3% | 83.3% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 6.223 | 3.174 |
| Total Cost | $1.121 | $0.540 |
| Input Price | $5.000 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Output Price | $25.000 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 134,770 | 93,046 |
| Output Tokens | 13,604 | 5,884 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 4,388 | 198,741 |
| Response Time (avg) | 6.99s | 10.05s |
| Response Time (max) | 30.67s | 36.22s |
| Response Time (total) | 153.80s | 221.06s |
| Parameters | ~5T total (~500B active) | ~150B total (~10B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#41 Claude Opus 5
low- Cost
- $0.062
- Time
- 30.2s
- Tokens
- 2,615 tok
#39 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
high- Cost
- $0.025
- Time
- 36.8s
- Tokens
- 9,964 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 834 | 1,008 | 376 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.96s | 498 | 142 | 7,917 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 77.8% | 1 | 6.70s | 10,590 | 2,442 | 760 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 16.58s | 8,130 | 434 | 57,369 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.05s | 97,363 | 6,024 | 911 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.90s | 68,427 | 4,360 | 52,993 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.69s | 10,503 | 343 | 79 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.17s | 7,362 | 279 | 5,636 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 8.91s | 972 | 1,928 | 1,479 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.14s | 656 | 17 | 54,566 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.76s | 708 | 293 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.10s | 488 | 81 | 2,124 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.13s | 909 | 242 | 146 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.16s | 625 | 69 | 3,513 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.23s | 894 | 607 | 300 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 572 | 183 | 4,004 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.03s | 11,739 | 354 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.55s | 6,132 | 310 | 2,955 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.48s | 258 | 363 | 337 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.68s | 156 | 9 | 7,664 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsMuse Spark 1.3mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.3mediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighClaude Opus 5lowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.2highClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.2mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.1mediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsMuse Spark 1.2medium