Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat

The average score is effectively tied at 8.1 vs 8.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.584 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 9.48s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 74.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.2 ChatIt has the strongest score in this comparison (8.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Release: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.1 8.0
Rank #31 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.8% 74.2%
Flaky tests 7 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.169 4.308
Total Cost $0.584 $0.604
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,138 101,248
Output Tokens 8,315 30,424
Reasoning Tokens 212,507 0
Response Time (avg) 9.48s 7.65s
Response Time (max) 43.93s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 208.52s 168.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
23.6s
Tokens
9,128 tok

#34 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair