Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 8.0 vs 8.0. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.604 vs $0.929. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 62.65s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.2 ChatIt has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 1.5x less than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.0 8.0
Rank #29 #30
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.308 5.873
Total Cost $0.604 $0.929
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,248 83,813
Output Tokens 30,424 69,688
Reasoning Tokens 0 225,659
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 62.65s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 168.39s 1378.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#29 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#30 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair