Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 (high) leads on average score with 8.0 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.929 vs $3.112. GLM 5.2 (high) is faster at 62.65s vs 122.48s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (high)It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 3.4x less than Kimi K3 (max).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Kimi K3 Kimi K3 max Release: 2026-07-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.0 8.0
Rank #31 #30
Reliability 9.1 10.0
Consistency 9.5 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 71.2%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 19.446 5.873
Total Cost $3.112 $0.929
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,916 83,813
Output Tokens 2,910 69,688
Reasoning Tokens 197,529 225,659
Response Time (avg) 122.48s 62.65s
Response Time (max) 766.58s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 2327.06s 1378.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

max
Cost
$0.281
Time
506.9s
Tokens
18,863 tok

#30 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 325.79s 8,061 460 84,012
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair