Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs GPT-5.2 Chat

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.060 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 74.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-07

Rank
#62
Total Output Tokens
168,165
Response Time (avg)
49.75s
Total Cost
$0.060
Rank
#44
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 8.0), while costing about 10.1x less than GPT-5.2 Chat.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 7.7 8.0
Rank #62 #44
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.6
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 74.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.402 4.308
Total Cost $0.060 $0.604
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 101,248
Output Tokens 14,478 30,424
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 0
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 7.65s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 168.39s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#44 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair