Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.418 vs $0.594. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.73s vs 45.52s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#59
Total Output Tokens
29,742
Response Time (avg)
7.73s
Total Cost
$0.594
Rank
#63
Total Output Tokens
197,632
Response Time (avg)
45.52s
Total Cost
$0.418
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 5.9x faster than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #59 #63
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.564 1.695
Total Cost $0.594 $0.418
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,104 97,698
Output Tokens 29,742 6,417
Reasoning Tokens 0 191,215
Response Time (avg) 7.73s 45.52s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 291.55s
Response Time (total) 162.40s 955.94s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#59 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#63 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair