AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#16

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic Release: 2026-04-16 Tested on: 2026-06-04 13:44 anthropic/claude-opus-4.7::medium
(medium) (none)

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 scores 8.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #16. It has 10.0 reliability, a 82.5% pass rate, $0.679 total cost, and 4.73s average response time.

What makes Claude Opus 4.7 unique: It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Score

8.7

Consistency

9.6

Total Output Tokens

14,056

Total Input Tokens

65,406

Input Price

$5.000 / 1M

Output Price

$25.000 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 4

Attempt pass rate: 82.5%

Flaky tests

1

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

4.73s

Response Time (max): 23.18s

Response Time (total): 94.51s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-06-04 13:44 New test added 8.7 10.0 $0.679 Current run
2026-05-22 00:18 Re-test 8.9 10.0 $0.625 Compare
2026-04-16 15:59 First recorded run 9.2 N/A $0.447 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Price History

Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.

Date Input Price Output Price
2026-06-04 15:40 $5.000 / 1M $25.000 / 1M

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 8.3 10.0
Coding 7.6 7.2
Combined 10.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 7.7 10.0
General Intelligence 10.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 10.0 10.0
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models