- Score
- 9.4 (+1.30 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 95.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 55.8% faster
Anthropic
Release: 2026-04-16
Tested on: 2026-10-01 01:36
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7::medium
~5T total (~500B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Claude Opus 4.7 scores 8.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #99. It has 10.0 reliability, a 81.2% pass rate, $3.636 total cost, and 14.12s average response time.
What makes Claude Opus 4.7 unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Agentic is its weakest area at #15.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+0.51 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 98.3% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 46.8% faster
- Score
- 9.6 (+1.49 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.460 · 87.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.15s · 49.3% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~5T total (~500B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. External industry estimate; vendor has not disclosed the architecture.
8.1
Consistency
9.3
10.0
$3.636
Total Output Tokens
57,978
Total Input Tokens
437,293
Input Price
$5.000 / 1M
Output Price
$25.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.500 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$6.250 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#99 Claude Opus 4.7
medium- Cost
- $0.059
- Time
- 26.8s
- Tokens
- 2,475 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 01:36 Re-test | 8.1 | 10.0 | $3.636 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-16 22:28 New test added | 8.7 | 10.0 | $1.477 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:44 New test added | 8.7 | 10.0 | $0.679 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:18 Re-test | 8.9 | 10.0 | $0.625 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-16 15:59 First recorded run | 9.2 | N/A | $0.447 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $5.000 / 1M | $25.000 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $5.000 / 1M | $25.000 / 1M | $0.500 / 1M | $6.250 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Claude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423highClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsSeed-2.0-LitemediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunahighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.4 Nanomedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 5.2 | 3.2 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 7.6 | 7.2 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |