指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #74 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 1/2 | 5.42s |
| #67 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 2.95s |
| #108 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 12.2s |
| #15 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.876 | 2/2 | 4.04s | |
| #278 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.862 | 0/2 | 3.99s |
| #247 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.841 | 2/2 | 92.5s |
| #232 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.834 | 2/2 | 7.50s |
| #243 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B max | Reflection | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.799 | 1/2 | 866ms |
| #219 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 0.9 | 0.7 | $0.795 | 1/2 | 1.33s |
| #304 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 1/2 | 4.12s |
| #332 | Ember-1 none | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.786 | 1/2 | 31.0s |
| #155 | Qwen3.6 Flash medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.783 | 2/2 | 6.05s |
| #194 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.781 | 2/2 | 6.64s |
| #168 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.778 | 1/2 | 6.96s |
| #116 | Gemini 3.8 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.769 | 2/2 | 4.81s |