指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #269 | Grok 4.20 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.246 | 2/2 | 4.26s |
| #63 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 1/2 | 18.4s |
| #157 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.275 | 2/2 | 10.3s |
| #124 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 2.70s | |
| #38 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #135 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.345 | 2/2 | 2.80s |
| #6 | GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.377 | 2/2 | 3.78s |
| #152 | Mistral Large 4 high | Mistral | 0.8 | 0.8 | $1.391 | 1/2 | 22.0s |
| #212 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.419 | 2/2 | 12.4s |
| #81 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.438 | 2/2 | 3.10s |
| #153 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.448 | 2/2 | 11.3s |
| #227 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.478 | 2/2 | 1.52s |
| #191 | Ember-1 low | Fireworks | 0.6 | 0.7 | $1.488 | 1/2 | 32.7s |
| #75 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.516 | 2/2 | 4.58s |
| #42 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 4.95s |